Jesus said, “...
Whoever is not against you is for you... He who is not with me is against
me...” Luke 9:50, Luke 11:23
“Oh, you
can’t believe the Bible! - it’s full of contradictions!”
Have you
ever had that said to you by a non-Christian friend? I wouldn’t be surprised.
And this is just the kind of thing they have in mind: in the space of a couple
of chapters Jesus seems to make two completely opposite statements. (The fact
that one speaks of “you” and the other of “me” is neither here nor there, for
Jesus and his disciples are united in purpose.)
Well, is
Jesus contradicting himself, or is there a convincing explanation? I believe
there is.
It all comes
down to that thing called “context” - in other words, the setting in which something occurs. Each of Jesus’ sayings is true,
if we take note of their settings. Think of a modern example. Here are two
sentences: “An hour is a very short time” and “An hour is a very long time”.
How can those two statements be anything but glaringly contradictory! There is
surely no way they can be reconciled.
But wait a
minute. Suppose you have just been told “You have one hour to live...” - that
first sentence would seem alarmingly true, the second one false. But suppose
you have been told “It will be an hour before the next bus arrives...” - you would
probably think the second sentence was disappointingly true and the first one
false. See what I mean about context? And see how two totally contradictory
statements can both be true?
So... what
are the contexts in which Jesus says these two things?
First,
“Whoever is not against you is for you.” If you go to Luke 9:49-50 you find
that one of the twelve is telling Jesus about someone they had met who was
using his name to cast out demons. And they are shocked. What a cheek! How dare
somebody who is not “one of us” presume to do the work of Jesus! So “we tried
to stop him.”
To which
Jesus replies: No! You did wrong. All right, that man may not yet be an
out-and-out disciple, but never mind. He was trying to do a good thing, and to
do it in my name. Leave him alone! - for “whoever is not against you is for
you”.
What do we
learn from this? In essence, not to be hard or condemning of people who, while
they may not be the kind of Christians we profess to be, are nonetheless
genuine in their desire to serve God. The emotional charismatic, for example,
mustn’t dismiss the stern Calvinist. The convinced baptist must accept as a
fellow-disciple the person who advocates infant baptism. (I’m sure you can think
of plenty of other examples.)
In other
words, that first saying is true - as a
lesson in tolerance.
So what
about the second saying: “He who is not with me is against me”? If we go now to
Luke 11:14-23 we find that Jesus is speaking in a completely different context,
all about the absolute opposition of light and darkness, truth and falsehood, God
and Satan. He is making clear that we are caught up in the middle of a
life-or-death battle between these two forces. And his point is that in this
battle there can be no neutrality. Try to be neutral - and you are in effect taking
sides against Jesus. And so: “He who is not with me is against me.”
This also is
true, then - as a solemn call to commitment.
So now the
bit that really matters: Which of the two
lessons do I personally need today? Am I, perhaps, a bit bigoted, a bit too
ready to dismiss anyone who doesn’t see things just my way? Do I need Jesus’
lesson in humility? Or am I the kind of person who tries to sit on the fence
when decision is called for? Is it time I responded to Jesus’ call to
commitment and discipleship?
Only our own
hearts can enable us to answer those questions. Why not stop right now, close
your eyes, think very honestly, and then respond in prayer?
Lord Jesus, help me to
be tolerant and accepting when that is what is called for, and to be unyielding
and uncompromising when truth is at stake. (And, of course, the wisdom to know
the difference!) Amen.