Jesus said, No-one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other… Matthew 6:24
You adulterous people, don’t you know that
friendship with the world means enmity with God? James
4:4
Do not be yoked together with unbelievers. For
what do righteousness and wickedness have in common?... 2
Corinthians 6:14
We often think of “compromise” as a largely negative word.
It conjures up ideas of weakness, lack of principle, spinelessness. We usually know
instinctively what’s right and what’s wrong, so when we fail to live up to it, we
are left with a vaguely troubled conscience which we hope will fade with time.
And so indeed it may; but deep down we are not really happy. We know we have
compromised.
The word itself doesn’t figure in the NIV Bible, but the
idea is often found. And in reality it isn’t quite as simple as we might think.
In a word, to compromise may sometimes be the right thing to do, not wrong at
all. The Bible gives us examples of both right and wrong.
First, when compromise is wrong…
The obvious example, as the Bible verses above make clear,
is denying or watering down our allegiance to Jesus. Do you ever find yourself
“taking the line of least resistance” or “keeping my head under the parapet” –
and then feeling bad about it? That suggests you’ve compromised; pangs of
conscience are a pretty clear pointer.
That’s when we need to remember Simon Peter. At the trial
of Jesus, he denied three times that he knew him (Matthw 26:69-75): that’s even
worse than mere compromise, isn’t it? He lost his head completely, it would
seem, even “calling down curses” and swearing “I don’t know the man”. But it
didn’t take him long to feel guilty – when the cock crowed, as predicted by
Jesus, “he went outside and wept bitterly”. Can you see him?
The story of Peter is wonderfully heartening, for we know
from John 21:15-19 that after Jesus was raised from the dead he restored him
and even gave him a key role in the life of the infant church. And in Acts 2 we
see him – this poor, pathetic, sobbing failure of a man – powerfully preaching
the first “Christian” sermon. True, on later occasions he could rather lose his
way (Galatians 2:11-21 for example), but there is no suggestion that he sinned
himself out of the grace of God.
Is this a reassurance you need today? As long as our regret
is heart-felt we can be assured of God’s loving hand upon us. Yes, compromise
in this most basic of senses is a serious thing. But it is not unforgivable.
Second, When may compromise be right, indeed necessary
and good?
This may be where we find ourselves swimming in rather
murky waters. The same Paul we have quoted about “not being yoked together with
unbelievers” sounds like an arch compromiser in 1 Corinthians 9, especially
verse 22: “I have become all things to all people…”. (That sounds almost like a
defence of hypocrisy!) In 2 Corinthians 8 he talks about “food sacrificed to
idols”, and whether or not Christians should eat it. Apparently different
options are possible for Christians, depending on circumstances. In Romans 14,
especially verses 19-23, he is concerned about the need for the mature but
sensitive Christian to moderate his or her behaviour for the sake of the less
confident believer. Compromise? Well, yes. But surely justified.
Perhaps his key statement is Romans 14:1, about the mistake
of quarrelling over disputable
matters”. Ah! – so there are such things as “disputable matters” (what
today we might call “grey areas”).
At risk of exaggeration you could say that one of the
tragedies of Christian history is that too often we have kept our mouths shut
when we should have opened them, for the heart of the gospel is at stake - but
then gone tooth and nail at one another over “disputable matters”.
This can apply to matters of doctrine. Does it really matter
whether you’re a premillennialist, a postmillennialist or even (gasp!) an
amillennialist? Is the exact meaning of “baptism in the Holy Spirit” something
to fall out over? Oh yes, be as convinced as you can by all means of the
rightness of your view; but aren’t such questions matters for healthy
compromise, for respectful discussion, not for tearing one another apart?
The point where things can get decidedly tricky may not be
strictly “doctrinal”. What if you have a child you really love, and in their
teenage years they come to tell you that they are gay? Do you turn them out of
the home? If, in time, they enter a same-sex relationship and invite you to the
“wedding”, do you go?
Something less acute but real nonetheless… You’re invited
to the office Christmas party and you really would prefer not to go, knowing
that the atmosphere will get unpleasant with drunkenness and ugly behaviour. Is
it a wrong type of compromise to decide that “at least I can show my face for
an hour”? Or would that be an example of mature discipleship?
And what about “assisted dying”? Many Christians
instinctively recoil against the idea – but others are more open to it. Is one
entirely right and the other entirely wrong?
I could go on; the possible examples are limitless, and not
every situation is reflected clearly in the Bible. Given certain possible scenarios,
how do I know when I’m “standing firmly for the truth” (no compromise!) and
when I’ve tippled over into sheer bigotry (oh no, failed again!)?
Christians in disagreement sometimes get impatient with
reasoned discussion: “All I want is a simple answer to a simple question!” they
cry. But… what if there is no “simple” answer? What then?
It may seem rather unsatisfactory, but if it teaches us to
discuss with one another thoughtfully and respectfully, actually listening to
one another rather than talking past one another or shouting each other down,
well, that at least is something, isn’t it? Let’s at least learn to disagree
agreeably. Or is that asking too much?
Father, my desire is to be rock-solid in my
allegiance to Jesus, but also infinitely adaptable when it comes to disputed
grey areas. Please help me not only to know the difference, but also to live daily
in the light of it! Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment